Treachery of the
ScientistsEight U.S. Space Rockets Were
Destroyed Possibly by Soviet Tesla Lightening Weapons in the Past 19 Months;
Soviet Moles inside the U.S. Government and Pro-Soviet SWcientists Prevent the
U.S. from Developing New, More Effective Weapons
At one time, the late Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev attempted to
intimidate the American people by saying, "We shall bury you." He also declared,
"The U.S. will eventually fly the Communist red flag."
Today, a considerable
number of American scientists, politicians, bankers, corporate executives, etc.
are strategically and actively supporting and cooperating with the Soviet Union.
In short, they are providing the Kremlin with the shovel to bury the U.S.
Eight U.S. Rockets Were Destroyed in the Past 19
MonthsThere is clear evidence to prove that the U.S. rockets were
deliberately assaulted and annihilated. The Atlas-Centaur, which blew up over
Cape Canaveral, Florida, on March 26, 1987, carried a very important strategic
defense very important strategic defense satellite. It was the target of a
Soviet electromagnetic attack.
Beginning with the explosion of a Titun-35-D
rocket in 1985, then the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger on January
28, 1986 and the demolition of the Atlas-Centaur on March 26, 1987, the U.S. has
lost eight rockets in mysterious accidents. This chain of accidents is unheard
of in the history of U.S. space programs. hese destroyed rockets were related to
the U.S. strategic defence program.
The Washington Times of March 27, 1987
reported: "The latest devastating NASA failure cost taxpayers' $161 million. The
137-foot rocket veered off course at 14,250 feet altitude and a halfmile two
Atlas-Centaurs left in NASA's inventory."
The destroyed rocket, which cost
$83 million, had many functions, one of which was to provide vital strategic
communication links to be used in the event of wwar. The "Fleet SatCom"
satellites controlled by the U.S. Navy are used to communicate with command
centers and ships at sea and with fighters and ground forces stationed around
the globe. These satellites also serve as an emergency communication link
between the President and the field officials posted all over the world.
This "Fleet SatCom" satellite destroyed on March 26 was part of a group of
strategic military satellites which are used to replace older, wornout
satellites. Generally speaking, satellites are supposed to operate for five
years, but four out of the five artificial satellites that are in space at
present have been in orbit for more than five years.
The Washington Post of
March 28, 1987, reported: "Of more than 2,000 rockets launched from Cape
Canaveral in more than three decades, only one is known to have been hit
lightning after launch."
When a bolt of lightning barely touched a Saturn V
rocket, the electrical system immediately returned to normal conditions and "the
Apollo 12 crew continued on their mission."
The seven consecutive U.S. space
disasters intensified criticism by the American people and Congress against the
space agency. However, in spite of the careful management and operation of the
space agency, the Atlass-Centaur was demolished by "something like a bolt of
The Washington Post of March 31, 1987 stated: "A four-stroke
flash of lightning struck within two miles of the launch pad at the Cape,
seconds before the rocket's steerable engines swerved 'hard cover,' pushing it
off course and sending it tumbling. That flash was observed between 48 and 53
seconds after launch, at 40 millisecond intervals."
John Busse, derector of
Flight Assurance at Goddard Space Flight Center, said: "Just before the rocket
veered off, traveling faster than the speed of sound..., a microphone in the
nose cone detected a sound that drove it 'off scale' and batteries in the Atlas
first stage and the Centaur second stage showed 'major electrical transients' of
Busse also stated: "The rocket's digital computer unit then
issued commands to the engines that sent the rocket tumbling out of control."
Busse concluded: "There certainly are a lot of strong indications
electromagnetic phenomena are associated with the failure of Atlas-Centaur 67...
it could be lightning, a vehicleinduced static charge and other things I'm not
smart enough to talk about."
(NASA is aware of Soviet electromagnetic
attack, but no NASA people will admit this because if they did, they could be
fired by pro-Soviet elements within the U.S. government.)
Times of April 17, 1987 reported: "The fact-finding committee for the rocket
disaster discovered that nine lightning strikes hit the AtlasCen5taur before it
The odds are very slight for more than one natural lightning
stroke to directly hit a rocket's tiny nose cone within a few seconds.
newspaper also reported: "Investigatiors are at a loss to explain how the
lightning strikes caused the onboard computers to send a hard-cover command
issued to the Atlas booster engine and caused the rocket to mysteriously veer
off course and out of control. It was as if it received a special encoded
command from the ground. Natural lightning would have simply knocked out the
computer and caused it to immediately lose power to some extent, but it never
issues any commands to the engines."
Natural Lightning and Tesla
LightningMan-made lightning(Soviet Scalar Weapons System) uses a
technique developed by Nikola Teslar, a great Soviet scientist and inventor.
As the explosion of seven U.S. rockets that has occured since August 25,
1985 shows, scalar weapons can easily destroy rockets in flight. The events
related to the demolition of the Atlas-Centaur rocket which occurred on March
26, 1987 provides strong evidence of the use of Teslar-scalar weapons.
spent most of his life generating controlled lightning and any high school
student couldobtain a Tesla Coil and generate lightning on an experimental
Before the Soviets began to use their Tesla Magnifying Transmitters
constantly in 1976, the Journal of Geophysical Reseach published an artocle
written by Dr. B.N. Turman. It stated, U.S. military intelligence satellites
reported sighting monster lightning bolts over the U.S.S.R. The 'superbolts'
were thousands of times more power to about 10 trillion watts and total energies
of more than one billion joules. Prior to these U.S. satellite sightings, the
most powerful natural lightning bolts ever recorded were only 10 billion watts
and contained total energies of one million joules."
On April 12, 1978, a
group of Canadian scientists associated with the Planatory Association for Clean
Energy(P.A.C.E.) published that the Soviet Tesla Magnifying Transmitter at Gomel
"has been known to emit alone, or in conjunction with a Riga facility-since
October 14, 1976, Extremely Low Frequency(ELF) magnetic signals at a strength of
up to 40,000,000 watts."
P.A.C.E. also reported that there is a
Soviet-controlled Tesla Magnifying Transmitter in the eastern part of Havana,
Immediately before August 25, 1985 when the first of the eight U.S.
rockets exploded, a group of Soviet scientists "withdrew a paper on microwave
generation, which was scheduled to be presented at an international conference
Dr. William A. Barletta of the Lawrence Livemore National
Laboratory in California explained that these Soviet scientists suddently
decided that their documents were classified.
Soviet Moles Inside the U.S. Government Prevent the
Development of American-made Tesla-WeaponsThe thought pattern
pattern of U.S. government high officials who are involved with important
defense matters has perevented the development of U.S. Tesla-scalar weapons and
many otherstrategic techniques.
The New York Times of April 23, 1985 stated:
"A little-known technical agency in the Defense Department has assumed a pivotal
role in pushing the U.S. towards revolutionary technologies that are neglected
or even opposed by the military services and leading industries. It is the
Defense Advanced Reseach Projects Agency, or DARPA."
"...DARPA had played a
key role in developing some of the nation's most advanced technologies (ranging
from cruise missiles to the futuristic weapons)."
Despite these facts, the
agency has refused to develope some advanced technologies.
Battista, a senior staff member of the House Committee Armed Services, said
DARPA had ... sometimes been timid ... refusing to undertake some projects until
they were rammed down its throat by the committee."
Senator Malcolm Wallop,
one of the few partiots left in the U.S. Congress, is one of the leading
supporters for the SDI programs. Senator Wallop criticized DARPA, saying, "The
agency has been spending money on technologies... whose revelance to weaponry is
at best tendentious, while neglecting to develop new weapons technologies that
could make a major difference in military operations."
At a 1981 lecture,
Col. Bearden stated, "There are Soviet moles, in my opinion, in our intelligence
communities, and one of their primary jobs is to see that this kind of
technology is not allowed to be developed in the United States of America. And
they have been very successful.
Surrender Mentality Is Spreading In U.S. Scientific
CommunityThe Washington Post of May 11, 1984 reported that Frank
Press who served as President Carter's science adviser said, "...the times call
for a new type of interaction with Soviet scientists... one based on cooperation
by outstanding working scientists in the forefront in 'nonsensitive' fields of
science in which the two countories are tje most advanced in the world." Since a
large number of leading ultra-liberal politicians and scientists are active in
providing the Soviets with the latest U.S. advanded technology, there is a
fierce controversy over the real meaning of "highly important scientific
The New York Times of November 4,1985 stated: "More than 1,600
scientists and nearly 1,200 graduate students have pledged to reject research
funds for work related to the Regan Administration's plan for a space-based
missile defense system..." The newspaper continued: "The organizersb said they
hoped to discourage scientists from accepting reserch funds from the Government
program intended to develop techniques and devices to destroy enemy missiles
before they could hit the United States." "The campaign has been particularly
successful in physics departments... More than half of the physicists at 23
institution have signed a pledge not to accept reserch funds under the U.S. SDI
missile defense program. Among the institutions are Cornell, Columbia, Harvard,
the Univ. of Illinois, Stanford..."
The New York Times also reported that
science granduate students of 90 universities participated in this pro-Soviet
campaign to block the development of the SDI. Extensive activities of these U.S.
scientists are a horrifying threat to U.S. survival. The mentality of surrender
and appeasement to the Soviets has spread far and wide among U.S. technical
specialists who have vital knowledge about the U.S. defense.
The New York
Times of July 1, 1985 stated that many U.S. and Soviet scientists who "work in
military laboratories" are holding meetings to exchange information and ideas
regarding scientific research and development.
Dr. Theodore B. Tailor, a
retired American nuclear bomb physicist, explained the U.S.-Soviet scintists'
meetings, "On one level here are two sets of scientists sharing a sense that
they are both working on weapons for the same reason... And they feel
friendly... There's a sense of camaraderie. It's a matter of shared experience."
U.S. Scientists Support Soviet Efforts to Dig America's
GraA large number of U.S. scientists are actively working in
order to help the Soviets order to help the Soviets develop their technologies.
The Soviets use the technology developed by U.S> scientists in the
development of their latest weapons system.
Gsponer, the director of the Geneva-based Independent Scientist Institute made
the following comments on the U.S.-Soviet scientific cooperation. "American and
Soviet arms reserchers are secretly working at Cern, the 6,000-person European
Laboratory for particle physics, which is just outside Geneva, Switzerland."
The New York Times stated: "Collaborations between weapons scientists
of East and West extend to powerful particle accelerators." Some scientists
comment that "these atom-smashers are 'a potential tool for the development of a
powerful beam weapon."
The New York Times reported: "One focus of
military interest in Cern is antimatter, according to Dr.Gsponer. The
laboratory now has the most powerful machine in the world for producing
antimatter particles, which are identical to reqular particles of matter in mass
and spin but have the opposite electrical charge. The military's interest
stems from the great energy released when particles of matter collide with those
of matter... Reactions between matter and antimatter produce a complete
liberation of huge energy... Antimatter weapons for the destruction of enemy
missiles and warheads were one of the possibilities cited by an early Pentagon
inquiry on creating a U.S. shield against incoming missiles."
of U.S. scientists joined their Soviet counterparts at a special antimatter
weapons conference held at Tigness-Savuie, France, in January, 1985. Among
the U.S. participants were some reseachers from the U.S. "Los Alamos Weapons
The New York Times of January 20, 1987 reported: "When
matter and antimatter particles collide, they are transformed into pure energy,
mainly in the form of gamma rays. The process liberates all the latent energy
the particles contain and is many times more efficient than that power of atomic
The Soviet Union is now developing antimatter
weapons for mass destruction through secret reseach - all with the assistance of
U.S. scientists - facts of which the average person is ignorant.
IN THE 21st CENTURY Things Japanese and Provocative Information]